Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Jairo Arnoldo Juarez Goden et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jose De Jesus Lopez Acosta, Cruz Carmen Mendoza Agurcia, Armando Feliciano Mejia Almendarez and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Mauricio Hicho et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Elder Emigdo Lira Acevedo, Orellana Cabrera Anibal, Felino Maroquin Archila and others
Defendant:
Hector Oliva Arriaza, Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Martinez-Ochoa v. USA
as 3:2008cv02000
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Martinez-Ochoa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Juan Gerardo Martinez-Reyes v. Dennis H. Burns et al
as 2:2008cv06039
Petitioner:
Juan Gerardo Martinez-Reyes
Respondent:
Dennis H. Burns, Rod Penner, Brian Demore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gomez et al v. Millan-Martinez et al
as 3:2008cv01442
Plaintiff:
Enedino Duran Gomez, Gerardo Duran Tovar, Reynaldo Galvan and others
Defendant:
Rossi Concrete, Inc., Joseph James Rossi and Rossi Concrete, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Jacobo et al
as 3:2008cr00963
Defendant:
Juan Sanchez-Martinez
Plaintiff:
USA
Undetermined:
Pedro Contreras-Lopez
Martinez v. Tilton et al
as 3:2007cv04684
Plaintiff:
Juan Angel Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
James E. Tilton and Robert A. Horel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales-Martinez v. Gonzales
as 2:2007cv00695
Petitioner:
Juan Morales-Martinez
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
