Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Sandnas v. Pacific Biosciences of California Inc et al
as 4:2011cv05669
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sandnas
Defendant:
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc , Hugh C. Martin , Susan K. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sandnas v. Pacific Biosciences of California Inc et al
as 5:2011cv05669
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sandnas and Robert Burlingame
Defendant:
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc , Hugh C. Martin , Susan K. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Pacific Biosciences of California Inc et al
as 5:2011cv05668
Plaintiff:
Greg Young and Robert Burlingame
Defendant:
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc, Hugh C. Martin, Susan K. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Velocity2 v. Sovereign Equity Group et al
as 1:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Velocity2
Defendant:
Sovereign Equity Group, Valencia Covington, James E. Tyson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Edward Baker v. Lee Sanford, et al
as 11-14015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE SANFORD, H.S.A., K. BARNES, H.S.A., BRODSKY, Chief Health Officer and others
Baker v. Sanford et al
as 2:2011cv14114
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Baker
Defendant:
Lee Sanford, K. Barnes, Brodsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. UNITES STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv06950
Petitioner:
DARRYL K. BARNES
Respondent:
UNITES STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BARNES v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2010cv05451
Plaintiff:
DARRYL K. BARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BARNES v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2009cv01475
Plaintiff:
DARRYL K. BARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
