Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
KPH Healthcare Services, et al v. Mylan, N.V., et al
as 23-3014
Plaintiff / Appellant: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Kinney Drugs, Inc., FWK HOLDINGS, LLC and CESAR CASTILLO, LLC, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: PFIZER, INC., KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Defendant: MYLAN ENTITIES
Mylan N.V., et al v. KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., et al
as 22-604
Petitioner: MYLAN N.V., MYLAN SPECIALTY L.P. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Respondent: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., AKA Kinney Drugs, Inc., FWK HOLDINGS, LLC and CESAR CASTILLO, LLC, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
KPH Healthcare Services, et al v. Pfizer, et al
as 22-603
Petitioner: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., AKA Kinney Drugs, Inc., FWK HOLDINGS, LLC and CESAR CASTILLO, LLC, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Respondent: PFIZER, INC., KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
IN RE: COPAXONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2022cv01232
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., d/b/a/ KINNEY DRUGS, INC., MEIJER, INC. and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, LABOR-MANAGEMENT HEALTHCARE FUND and NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS COUNCIL HEALTH AND HOSPITAL FUND
Interested Party: KING COUNTY and CITY OF TACOMA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Mongeon v. KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00195
Plaintiff: Matthew Raymond Mongeon
Defendant: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. doing business as Kinney Drugs
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv11255
Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and Kinney Drugs, Inc.
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Endo International PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. AMARIN PHARMA, INC.. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv12747
Defendant: AMARIN CORPORATION PLC, NOVASEP, INC., CHEMPORT, INC. and others
Plaintiff: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and KINNEY DRUGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Hetero USA Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08756
Defendant: Hetero USA Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Ascend Laboratories, LLC and others
Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. a/k/a Kinney Drugs, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and Kinney Drugs, Inc.
Interested Party: J M Smith Corporation d/b/a Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. v. AbbVie Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv08754
Defendant: Allergan Sales, LLC, AbbVie Inc., Allergan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. a/k/a Kinney Drugs, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and Kinney Drugs, Inc.
Interested Party: J M Smith Corporation d/b/a Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?