Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
KUBICKI VENTURE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. PANACHE HOLDINGS LLC
as 1:2012mc00331
Plaintiff:
KUBICKI VENTURE INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
PANACHE HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Kubicki Venture Investments, LLC v. Panache Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00551
Plaintiff:
Kubicki Venture Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Panache Holdings LLC , Reid & Rudiger LLC , Evermore Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
KUBICKI et al v. MEDTRONIC, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
JOHN KUBICKI and KAREN KUBICKI
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC. , MEDTRONIC DIABETES and MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Waldemar Kubicki v. Curry Computer Technology, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01320
Defendant:
Michael Curry, Curry Computer Technology, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Waldemar Kubicki
Joyce Kubicki v. USA
as 10-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE KUBICKI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kubicki v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv10722
Plaintiff:
Joyce Kubicki
Defendant:
United States of America
Joyce Kubicki v. Approximately 3.38 acres of la
as 09-2378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE KUBICKI
Defendant - Appellee:
APPROXIMATELY 3.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NEAR COUNTY OF OAKLAND, STATE OF MICHIGAN and OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Kubicki v. Real Property 3.38 Acres of Land Located Near Oakland County Michigan
as 2:2009cv14044
Defendant:
Real Property 3.38 Acres of Land Located Near Oakland County Michigan
Plaintiff:
Joyce Kubicki
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
