Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Bridges v. Roman et al
as 5:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Bridges, Jr.
Defendant:
Rafael Roman, I. L. Negron, Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Negron et al v. Falvey's Motors, Inc
as 3:2008cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jorge L. Negron and Gladys Lisboa
Defendant:
Falvey's Motors, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Wade
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ivan L. Negron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WEBB v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2007cv01203
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL J. WEBB
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, VANESSA ADEMS, L. SHARPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Negron v. Allied Capital Mortgage Company et al
as 3:2007cv00863
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Negron, Jr.
Defendant:
Allied Capital Mortgage Company and Douglas Klezmer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
White v. Negron et al
as 6:2007cv00825
Plaintiff:
Felton White
Defendant:
I. L. Negron, C. Lockett, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Negron et al
as 5:2007cv00213
Plaintiff:
Felton White
Defendant:
I. L. Negron, C. Lockett, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drayton v. Negron et al
as 5:2007cv00111
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Bernard Drayton
Defendant:
Ivan L. Negron, L. Green, Tracy Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gardner v. Tidwell et al
as 5:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
James Gardner, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Tidwell, Nikbakht, R. Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
