Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Johnson v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00479
Petitioner:
Dennis L Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00663
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CRAIG L. JOHNSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON et al v. HOGUE et al
as 1:2011cv01039
Plaintiff:
DIANE CATT and REBA L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
HARRY H. HOGUE and U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Johnson et al v. Franciscan Alliance Inc
as 2:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Johnson and Yolanda Hudson-Johnson
Defendant:
Franciscan Alliance Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
JOHNSON et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01308
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. JOHNSON and DARLENE JOHNSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JOHNSON v. BUSTIN AND SOREY et al
as 1:2008cv01712
Plaintiff:
LONNIE L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BUSTIN AND SOREY, BONNIE J. CLARK, MACK AUTHOR ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
REGIONS BANK v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2008cv00034
Plaintiff:
REGIONS BANK
Defendant:
RAYMOND M. JOHNSON, BETTY L. JOHNSON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JOHNSON et al v. CARR et al
as 4:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
CHRYSTY L. JOHNSON and MARSHALL JOHNSON
Defendant:
JIMMY W. CARR, JIMMY W. CARR, MORRISON DRIVER'S SERVICE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
