Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Smith v. Shivers et al
as 3:2009cv01027
Plaintiff:
Donald K Smith
Defendant:
Jimmy Shivers, Larry Cox and James LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
Simmie L Hill
Defendant:
Lydia Smith, Larry Cox and Jimmy Shivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Nolan et al
as 3:2009cv00666
Plaintiff:
Michael A Robertson
Defendant:
Wanda Nolan, Jimmy Shivers and Larry Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Eddie Morris
Defendant:
Lydia Smith, Larry Cox and Jimmy Shivers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Madison Parish et al
as 3:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Samella Anderson
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Madison Parish, Larry Cox, Sammy Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright v. Cox et al
as 3:2008cv01555
Plaintiff:
Clifton L Wright
Defendant:
Larry Cox, Jimmy Shivers, Edioin Moberly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Madison Parish et al
as 3:2007cv02226
Plaintiff:
Tony L Holmes
Defendant:
Detention Center Madison Parish, Lillien and Larry Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Madison Correctional Center et al
as 3:2007cv00855
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson, III
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Center, Larry Cox, Jimmy Shivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Madison Parish et al
as 3:2007cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jermera Marquez Mayo
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office of Madison Parish, Larry Cox, Detention Center Madison Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batiste v. Madison Parish et al
as 3:2007cv00727
Plaintiff:
Paul Felton Batiste
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office of Madison Parish, Larry Cox, Detention Center Madison Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
