Cases 41 - 50 of 222
Uzomba v. Uzomba et al
as 1:2021cv02492
Defendant:
Dale T. Frye, Jane Doe, Robert Uzomba and others
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Uzomba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Ellis et al
as 4:2020cv00170
Respondent:
Roundtable Property & Development, LLC, Thomas Chapman Causby, Gareth Ross Rogers and others
Petitioner:
Marlee Tatum Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Lawson v. Ledbetter et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawson
Defendant:
Carroll County Jail, Jack T. Bell Detention Center, Officer Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunet v. K.R. Drenth Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01320
Defendant:
Shartrellis Lawson, K.R. Drenth Trucking, Inc., Endurance Environmental Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brittney Brunet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays et al v. Hininser et al
as 5:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Webb Warden Ricky Stone, Damon Hininser, Warden Steve Upton and others
Plaintiff:
Early Glenn, Willie Mays, George Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Langley
as 3:2020cv00170
Petitioner:
Richard Lawson
Respondent:
Terry Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Culver et al v. ATM Response, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03551
Defendant:
ATM Response, Inc. and Clayton Braswell
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Culver, Roy Thomas Eidson, Thomas Heape and others
BROXTON v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2020cv00192
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L BROXTON
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOUNTAIN v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2020cv00406
Defendant:
CURTIS CARTER, CAPTAIN MARK AGBAOSI, CAPTAIN THOMAS F SUMPTER and others
Plaintiff:
BRENDA MOUNTAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOUNTAIN et al v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2020cv00405
Defendant:
CURTIS CARTER, JOSEPH L POLITE, CAPTAIN MARK AGBAOSI and others
Petitioner:
BRENDA MOUNTAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
