Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Schuenke v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00153
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T Schuenke
Defendant:
United States of America, Donald J Trump, United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schuenke v. Kostrzewa
as 2:2018cv00151
Petitioner:
Lloyd T Schuenke
Respondent:
Jennifer Kostrzewa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schuenke v. Kostrzewa
as 2:2018cv00152
Petitioner:
Lloyd T Schuenke
Respondent:
Jennifer Kostrzewa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schuenke v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T Schuenke
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Jon Litscher, Kathryn Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson, Darryl et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2017cv00846
Plaintiff:
Darryl Nelson
Defendant:
Doe, Michael Dittmann , Lucas Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Key, Prince v. Mashak, Meredith et al
as 3:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Prince Key
Defendant:
Meredith Mashak , Keisha Perrenoud , Salam Syed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Sessions
as 2:2017cv00688
Plaintiff:
Gary Lloyd Barnes
Defendant:
Jeff B Sessions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate No SUA WS20114-1601 v. iStream Financial Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate No SUA WS20114-1601
Defendant:
iStream Financial Services Inc, Kris Axberg, Richard Joachim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Barnes v. State of Wisconsin
as 1:2016cv01692
Plaintiff:
Gary Lloyd Barnes
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Travis v. Syed, Salam et al
as 3:2016cv00474
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Williams
Defendant:
Salam Syed , Scott Hoftiezer, Vickrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
