Cases 41 - 50 of 411
Adams v. Kupiszewski et al
as 2:2022cv01014
Plaintiff:
Charles Adams
Defendant:
Stephen Kupiszewski, Emily Kile, Jennifer Kupiszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Laws v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00937
Plaintiff:
Addis Adam Laws, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Division of Child Support Services, Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vondran v. Antonelli et al
as 2:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Steven C Vondran
Defendant:
Jeffrey J Antonelli, Law Offices of Jeffrey J Antonelli Limited, Tristan Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Matern v. D. Baker Law Group PC
as 2:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Sharon Matern
Defendant:
D. Baker Law Group PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
