Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, et al v. Eugene Horton, LLC., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02111
Plaintiff: Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Those Certain Underwriters at London Market Insurers
Defendant: Eugene Horton LLC , Eugene Horton and OAMPS Special Risks Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Insurance
Olin Corporation v. Insurance Company of North Ame
as 11-4579
Plaintiff - Appellee: Olin Corporation
Third-Party-Defendant: Olin-Hunt Specialty Products Inc.
Cross-Defendant: Onebeacon American Insurance Company, referred to in this litigation as Commercial Union Insurance Company
Defendant: Insurance Company of North America, Hanover Insurance Company, as successor to Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, American Re-Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellant: Century Indemnity Company
Olin Corporation v. Insurance Company of North Ame We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-4055
Plaintiff - Appellant: Olin Corporation
Third-Party-Defendant: Olin-Hunt Specialty Products Inc.
Cross-Defendant: Onebeacon American Insurance Company, referred to in this litigation as Commercial Union Insurance Company
Defendant: Insurance Company of North America, Hanover Insurance Company, as successor to Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, American Re-Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellee: American Home Assurance Company
Boston Gas Company v. Century Indemnity Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1931
Plaintiff - Appellant: BOSTON GAS COMPANY, d/b/a Keyspan Energy Keyspan LNG LP, d/b/a Keyspan Energy Delivery
Defendant - Appellee: CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY
Third Party Defendant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, f/k/a Aetna Casualty & Surety Company and others
Interested Party: MENDES & MOUNT, LLP and COMPLEX INSURANCE
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00340
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
B E P C O L P v. Santa Fe Minerals Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00132
Plaintiff: B E P C O L P
Defendant: Santa Fe Minerals Inc , 15375 Memorial Corp , Entities Holding Inc and others
Cross_defendant: Certain Unidentified Underwriters at Lloyds London , United States Fire Insurance Co , First State Insurance Co and others
Third_party_defendant: Twin City Fire Insurance Co , Navigators Insurance Co , St Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co and others
Cross_claimant: Santa Fe Minerals Inc , 15375 Memorial Corp , Entities Holding Inc and others
Third_party_plaintiff: Entities Holding Inc , Santa Fe Minerals Inc , Transocean Worldwide Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Insurance
Teck Metals Ltd v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd', et al
as 10-36130
Plaintiff - Appellee: TECK METALS LTD, AKA Teck Cominco Metals LTD
Defendant - Appellant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd, et al v. USDC-WAESP
as 10-73807
: In re: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES
Petitioner: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest: TECK METALS LTD, FKA Teck Cominco Metals LTD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00316
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
In re: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd, et al
as 10-1701
Petitioner: In re: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?