Cases 41 - 50 of 215
Thomas v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2019cv03728
Defendant:
T. J. Smith, J. Vasquez, B. Bebee and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuckey v. Howard et al
as 4:2019cv03691
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, Officer Peterson, M. Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Kenneth Stuckey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Darren L. Harris v. Armando Martinez et al
as 2:2019cv05269
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Jacob Ferrso, Correctional Officer Armando Martinez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Darren L Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Epps et al
as 1:2019cv00154
Defendant:
Shelby Epps, Randy Blades, Mark Way and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Garza v. B. Cates, et al
as 19-15804
Defendant / Appellee:
M. VOONG, B. CATES and M. HODGES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL GARZA
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman et al
as 1:2019cv00225
Defendant:
S. Magnia, K. Rening, A. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Solomon v. Ines Castaneda, et al
as 19-15219
Defendant / Appellee:
H. TATE, ROLLAND, R. PRESS and others
Defendant:
K. SAMPSON, A. BANKS, LISA GREEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT U. SOLOMON, AKA Vincent Urain Solomon
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman et al
as 2:2019cv00246
Defendant:
S. Magnia, K. Rening, A. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv12393
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc., Actavis LLC, Hospira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ernia M Hodges and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
