Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Gabinay, et al v. Intermolecular, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2014cv00737
Plaintiff:
Elmer Hinkle Gabinay , Abdela Alemu , Lorenzo Dusseault and others
Defendant:
Intermolecular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edwin Paul Dorava v. A.M. Gonzalez
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2013cv02282
Petitioner:
Edwin P. Dorava
Respondent:
A M Gonzalez
Dorava v. A.M. Gonzalez
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2013cv04553
Plaintiff:
Edwin P. Dorava
Defendant:
A. M. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRD LLC v. Roana C Gonzalez et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2013cv07037
Defendant:
Does, Edgar M Gonzalez and Roana C Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
PRD LLC
Jorge Cornejo et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2013cv05234
Defendant:
Sheriff Lee Baca, County of Los Angeles, Deputy R M Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cornejo, Joseph Cornejo, Sandra Cornejo and others
Rodriguez v. Gonzalez
as 3:2013cv01667
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez
Respondent:
M. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Vicente M Gonzalez et al
as 5:2013cv00941
Defendant:
Does, Minvilu C Gonzalez, Vicente M Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.