Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Coltrane v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv02231
Plaintiff:
Mary L Coltrane
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin , Gerardo Maldonado, Jr , Joe Keffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez-Garcia v. Martinez et al
as 1:2012cv01009
Plaintiff:
Raul Gonzalez-Garcia
Defendant:
Martinez, Ma'at, Bowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Martinez et al
as 1:2012cv01008
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ramirez
Defendant:
Martinez, Ma'at, Bowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrego Abrego et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01301
Defendant:
Dole Food Company, Inc., Dole Fresh Fruit Company, Standard Fruit Company and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Abrego , Bernardo Abrego Jorieto , Simon Abrego Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J P Young, G Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter et al v. Maldonado et al
as 2:2010cv01617
Plaintiff:
Aaron Porter and Freddie Reimonenq
Defendant:
Amado Maldonado and Northland Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McQueen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv00847
Plaintiff:
Anthony McQueen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatten v. Micieli et al
as 2:2010cv00507
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
J Micieli, D Mandolfo, J P Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv01902
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, G Maldonado, D Bracy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
