Cases 41 - 50 of 368
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Martin v. Live Oak County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00156
Defendant:
Daniel Coban Barton, Live Oak County Jail, Live Oak County Sheriffs Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. McNamara
as 6:2022cv00666
Petitioner:
Aaron Maurice Spencer
Respondent:
Sheriff Parnell McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zuniga et al v. Bastrop County et al
as 1:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Diana S. Zuniga, Martha Zuniga, Ancieto Zuniga-Felan and others
Defendant:
Bastrop County, Bastrop County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Maurice Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00893
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hall v. Polk et al
as 9:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Maurice Deman Hall
Defendant:
Balden O Polk, Carlos Applewhite and Cristin L Boykin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv00842
Petitioner:
Maurice Ellison
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., v. Eggleston et al
as 2:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.,
Defendant:
Maurice K Eggleston, Jr and Margaret H Eggleston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
