Cases 41 - 50 of 97
WELCH v. Whole Foods Market, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10021
Defendant:
AUS DETROIT MICHIGAN, Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, ARAMARK SERVICES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WELCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Platinum Management (NY) LLC et al
as 3:2018mc51605
Defendant:
Platinum Credit Management, LP, Mark Nordlicht, Daniel Small and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Undetermined:
Melanie L. Cyganowski
Doe v. USA Gymnastics et al
as 1:2018cv01024
Defendant:
Mitch Lyons, Dan Kelly, Brian Mosallam and others
Plaintiff:
Jane P.S. Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Nassar et al
as 1:2018cv01026
Defendant:
Mitch Lyons, Lawrence Gerard Nassar, Brian Mosallam and others
Plaintiff:
Jane S.M. Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mulholland et al
as 2:2018cv12219
Defendant:
Melanie Mulholland, James C Mulholland, Jr. and UTR 2, LLC
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Bellis vs. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
McFadden Bellis , M C.1. , Eyondra McFadden and others
Petitioner:
Arnett Rison, III and A.1 R.IV.
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman v. Parson et al
as 2:2018cv10673
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Mary Parson, Rick Raymond, Hanna Saad and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2017cv12805
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Spearman
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Department of Mental Health, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
