Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00456
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Komor v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Christian Robert Komor
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph R Biden, Steffanie Feldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Larsgard v. Martinez et al
as 2:2021cv01748
Petitioner:
John Kristoffer Larsgard
Defendant:
John P Martinez, Christopher Howard, Merrick Garland and others
Respondent:
Tae Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01106
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Todd v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2021cv01144
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Ramael Todd also known as Ramael Blackwell El Trust doing business as Ronnie Ramael Todd doing business as Ramael Blackwell El and Ramael Blackwell El Trust
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Estate of Ronnie Ramael Todd, Estate of Ryan Ramael Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillan v. Garland et al
as 2:2021cv01036
Plaintiff:
Peter A McMillan
Defendant:
Kate Gallego, Drug Enforcement Administration, Jeri Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
