Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Hoffman v. Hennessey
as 3:2009cv01777
Plaintiff:
Duane Allen Hoffman
Defendant:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Hennessey
as 3:2009cv01775
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Caldwell
Defendant:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fahy v. Tarbox et al
as 3:2009cv01420
Plaintiff:
Frank Fahy
Defendant:
Orpheos Tarbox, Alec Steiner, T. Buelow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Von Merta v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2009cv00753
Plaintiff:
Robert Von Merta
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, Heather Fong and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Starks v. Hennessey
as 3:2008cv05490
Petitioner:
Marion Cedric Starks
Respondent:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. San Francisco Sheriff's Deputies et al
as 4:2008cv04977
Plaintiff:
Rickard Dennis Anderson
Defendant:
San Francisco Sheriff's Deputies, Michael Hennessey, Jail Psychiatrist and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Hennessey et al
as 4:2008cv04946
Petitioner:
Rickard Dennis Anderson
Respondent:
Michael Hennessey, San Francisco County Jail Sheriff's Deputies, Heather Fong and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero v. Hennessey et al
as 5:2008cv04675
Plaintiff:
Steven T. Romero
Defendant:
Michael Hennessey and Jones Star
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2008cv04172
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
San Francisco Sheriff's Department, Michael Hennessey, Laval and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2008cv03696
Plaintiff:
Kyle Adams and Kyle Adams
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Michael Hennessey and Scott Neu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
