Cases 41 - 50 of 360
Morris v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Orlando Morris
Defendant:
Sherry Sullivan and The City of Fairhope Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris-Shea Bridge Company Inc v. Zuleger
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Morris-Shea Bridge Company Inc
Defendant:
Eric Zuleger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Coleman v. Arnold et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Quishawn Coleman
Defendant:
Houston County Jail, Brandon McGee, Dontrell Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rogers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
Antonio Williams and Antonio R. Williams
Defendant:
Morris Rogers, Sgt. Green, Officer Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Morris et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00739
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Sgt. Morris, Donald Valenza, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DC Injury Solutions LLC v. Morris Bart LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
DC Injury Solutions LLC doing business as Injury Solution, The
Defendant:
Morris Bart LLC and Morris Bart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Whitt v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1) (LEAD)
as 1:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, James Brazier and Officer Morris
Consolidated Defendant:
Sharon King and Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 1:2021cv00705
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Brazier, Kelita Moore, Donald J. Valenza and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Officer Isler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01386
Plaintiff:
Gates, Teresa Gates, Angela Irvin and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc
Scott v. Smith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00662
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marcellos Scott
Defendant:
Otis Smith, Christopher Gordon, Camelia Cargle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
