Cases 41 - 50 of 786
Weiss v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
Cataldi v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Russel Cataldi
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
Harter et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Mark Harter, Robert Baker, Christopher Henley and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Dunbar v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Dearl Dunbar
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
Myers v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Holli Myers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Gong v. Sarnoff et al
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Junwu Gong
Defendant:
Sarnoff M Stuart, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Carl M Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Athayde v. Dogpound Fitness, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09547
Plaintiff:
Rhys Athayde
Defendant:
Dogpound Fitness, Inc. and Kirk Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Reed v. Carpenelli et al
as 9:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Benji D. Reed
Defendant:
Michael Carpenelli, Timothy Thayer, James Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
