Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Evanston Insurance Company v. Robinson et al
as 3:2016cv00568
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
K. Mack Robinson, Jason Rutland, Angela Nicole Hotard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lott v. Adkison et al
as 2:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Gary Lott
Defendant:
Brian J. Adkison and Mark E. Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spann v. Management and Training Corp, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Keith Spann
Defendant:
Management and Training Corp, Inc. , Lawrence Mack , Lepher Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James et al v. Lewis
as 3:2015cv00920
Plaintiff:
Mack James and Larry Fisher
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Macke v. American General Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv00853
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Macke
Defendant:
American General Life Insurance Company , Stanford Beasley and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montgomery v. Housby Mack, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00795
Plaintiff:
Michael Montgomery
Defendant:
Housby Mack, Inc., Weiler, Inc. , Five Star Industries, Inc. and others
Movant:
AmTrust North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Water Services, Inc. et al v. Miller et al
as 3:2015cv00423
Plaintiff:
U.S. Water Services, Inc. and Global Water Services Holding Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Luke Miller and Timothy "Mack" Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mack v. Davis et al
as 4:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Mack
Defendant:
Roger Davis, Stanley Brooks, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montson v. Hinds Community College et al
as 3:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Montson
Defendant:
Hinds Community College, George Thrash, Robert Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber v. Mack
as 3:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Barber
Defendant:
Lawrence Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
