Cases 41 - 50 of 715
Barton v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00629
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Janelle Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sands v. State of Oregon, et al,.
as 2:2021cv00631
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrave v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00633
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Gaye Hargrave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalei Morris v. Mark Nooth
as 21-35301
Petitioner / Appellant:
KALEI ALOHA MORRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH
Robert Emery, Jr. v. Michael Gower, et al
as 21-35283
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN JUANITA ROSALES, BHS Manager, TRCI, in their individual and official capacities, M. VENTURA, Statewide ADA Coordinator, ODOC, in their individual and official capacities, M. PERRY, Acting Assistant Superintendent Corrections, in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE EMERY, Jr.
Robert Emery, Jr. v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 21-35278
Defendant / Appellee:
A. EYNON, Grievance Coordinator, TRCI, MARK NOOTH, Eastside Institutions Administator, Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC), HEEHN, Captain; Security Operations, TRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE EMERY, Jr.
Moore v. Thurnau et al
as 2:2021cv00483
Defendant:
Michael Gower, M. Grant, K. Wiley and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Everett Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassandra Rose v. Mark Patton, et al
as 21-35240
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, TROY BOWSER, Warden, MARK PATTON, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSANDRA LORRAINE ROSE
Dasay Hollinquest v. Michael Payne, et al
as 21-35194
Defendant / Appellee:
I. SILVA, Correctional Officer, FRANK SERRANO, Hearing Officer, STEVE FRANKE, Eastside Institution Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DASAY HOLLINQUEST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
