Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Englehart v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2007cv00231
Plaintiff:
William Englehart
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island and State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Costa v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2007cv00221
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kent Costa
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Town of Walpole, Walpole Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Citizens Financial Group Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, LP
Defendant:
Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Citizens Bank, Citizens Bank of New Hampshire and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Mueffelman v. United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2007mc00044
Petitioner:
Steven D Mueffelman
Respondent:
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, USA and President of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mueffelman v. United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2007mc00042
Plaintiff:
Steven D Mueffelman
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, United States Department of Justice, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mueffelman v. United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
as 1:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
Steven D Mueffelman
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mueffelman v. United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
Steven D Mueffelman
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
