Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Adams et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jackie D. Adams, Shirley Anderson, Bill Batts and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bello v. Means et al
as 4:2008cv00523
Plaintiff:
Mike Bello and Tonie Williams
Defendant:
Terry R Means, Eugene DuBose and Unknown others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Broderick et al v. Chapman et al
as 3:2008cv01075
Plaintiff:
M Elizabeth Broderick, Maria Joanna Pimentel, Lauren Olivia Tyler and others
Defendant:
W. Elaine Chapman, John McBryde, Terry Means and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McLaughlin et al v. Intrepid Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00798
Plaintiff:
Angela McLaughlin, Cheryl Acker, Ella Wilson and others
Defendant:
Intrepid Holdings, Inc., RX Fulfillment Services, Inc., My Urban Clinic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Xuan v. Means et al
as 4:2007cv00756
Plaintiff:
Bui Phu Xuan
Defendant:
Terry R Means and John McBryde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Odeh v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2007cv00411
Plaintiff:
Osama 'Sam' Odeh
Defendant:
Karen Mitchell, A Joe Fish, Terry Means and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Means v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv01278
Plaintiff:
Darryl W Means
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Espinoza v. Internal Revenue Service IRS Dallas Division et al
as 3:2007cv00526
Plaintiff:
John T Espinoza
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service IRS Dallas Division, The USA, The City of Fort Worth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
