Cases 41 - 50 of 89
McCoy v. Maye
as 5:2014cv03104
Petitioner:
Michael D. McCoy
Respondent:
Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCoy v. Craven et al
as 1:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
Michael C McCoy
Defendant:
Olivia Craven, Mary Morris, Todd Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McCoy et al
as 1:2014cv01185
Plaintiff:
Sherman . Davis
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Joseph M Needham, Brian L Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Thomas v. Michael McCoy, et al
as 14-2032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. MCCOY, BRIAN ASBELL, BRENT CHRISTIAN and others
McCoy v. Hart et al
as 1:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael A McCoy
Defendant:
Charles Hart, Debra Bolen, Rubina Berumen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lionel Robinson v. Michael McCoy, et al
as 14-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIONEL D. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. MCCOY, JOSEPH M. NEEDHAM, BRIAN ASBELL and others
Stephen Foulks v. Michael McCoy, et al
as 13-3879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN FOULKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. MCCOY, DOCTOR WEINSTEIN, PATRICIA MATTUS and others
Luana Scott v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
as 13-2062
:
In re: FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED, WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUANA SCOTT, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
TANYA LAKITSHA WARREN, a/k/a Tanya Warren-Thomas, CLAIR W. TROST, SR., KHIALLAH SOLOMON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED
Purdle et al v. McCoy et al
as 1:2013cv01269
Plaintiff:
Timothy Purdle, David Buford, Antoine Sims and others
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Rob McCoy, Brian Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. McCoy et al
as 1:2013cv01229
Plaintiff:
Antoine Sims
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Joseph M Needham, Brian L Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
