Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Myers v. State of South Carolina
as 1:2011cv00450
Petitioner:
Michael D Myers
Respondent:
Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
First Chatham Bank v. Landers et al
as 2:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
First Chatham Bank
Defendant:
Christopher T Landers and Michael D Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Barnhill et al v. Aegon USA LLC et al
as 7:2010cv01827
Plaintiff:
Howard F Barnhill , Victor M Bolin , Joel K Brannon and others
Defendant:
Aegon USA LLC and Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Cox et al vs Gamble et al
as 4:2008cv03792
Plaintiff:
Michael D Cox, Michael D Cox, Michael D Cox and others
Defendant:
Allen B Gamble and ABG Consulting Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv03233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Meyers et al
as 4:2008cv01890
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jackson
Defendant:
Reynaldo Meyers, Milton Pope and Assistant Dir Harrell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United Insurance Company of America v. Burdette et al
as 6:2007cv03937
Plaintiff:
United Insurance Company of America, United Insurance Company of America and United Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
S Carol Burdette, William D Robinson, Thomas B Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
