Cases 41 - 50 of 55
MOODY v. HANKS
as 2:2010cv00171
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
JOSHUA MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymer et al v. Mollenhauer et al
as 3:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymer , Eric Morse , Donald Hicks and others
Defendant:
Mike Mollenhauer and LaPorte County of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AgStar Financial Services PCA et al v. De Jong Dairy Leasing LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
AgStar Financial Services PCA and AgStar Financial Services FLCA
Defendant:
De Jong Dairy Leasing LLC, De Jong Dairy LLC, Simon De Jong and others
Receiver:
Elizabeth M Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Wilson et al
as 3:2010cv00150
Defendant:
Bill Wilson, FNU Botroff, Lt Reveter and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Maximillian Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Speedway SuperAmerica LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00348
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Moody
Defendant:
Speedway SuperAmerica LLC, Speedway SuperAmerica LLC and EMRO Marketing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MOODY v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2009cv00237
Petitioner:
JOHN B. MOODY
Respondent:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRADFORD v. MOODY et al
as 3:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANTONIO BRADFORD
Defendant:
MOODY, VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and JOHN MARVEL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cochran v. Nozick et al
as 2:2008cv00306
Plaintiff:
Larry Cochran
Defendant:
James T Moody, David J Nozick, Stephen R Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOODY v. HANKS
as 2:2008cv00338
Petitioner:
JOSHUA MOODY
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sellers v. Moody et al
as 1:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Sellers
Defendant:
James T Moody, John Doe, Roger B Cosbey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
