Cases 41 - 50 of 92
O'Neal v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Cedric W. O'Neal
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Attorney General Andy Breshear and Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humana Insurance Company of Kentucky v. O'Neal et al
as 2:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Humana Insurance Company of Kentucky
Defendant:
Whitney O'Neal , Tessa M. Perkins, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cross_claimant:
Whitney O'Neal
Cross_defendant:
Tessa M. Perkins
Counter_claimant:
Whitney O'Neal
Counter_defendant:
Humana Insurance Company of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Morrison v. Humana Inc.
as 3:2016cv00598
Plaintiff:
Neal Morrison
Defendant:
Humana Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vincent v. USA
as 1:2016cv00575
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joshua O'Neal Vincent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reece v. Carey
as 3:2016cv00069
Defendant:
Shelby County, Kentucky, Shelby County, Kentucky doing business as Shelby County Detention Center, Bobby Waits and others
Plaintiff:
Reece and Joshua Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Sepanek
as 7:2016cv00028
Petitioner:
Samuel Neal Hart
Respondent:
Michael Sepanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Neal v. T S Trucking, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
Elmer Neal
Defendant:
The First Liberty Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mattingly v. Breckinridge County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
Robert Mattingly
Defendant:
Breckinridge County Jail, Tara Shrewsberry, Josh Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Collins
as 3:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
Helen Neal
Defendant:
Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Swift et al
as 4:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jacob O'Neal Swift, Kirstie Diane Swift and Grayson County, KY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
