Cases 41 - 50 of 196
Hankins et al v. Gold Crown Management L.L.C.
as 4:2019cv00630
Plaintiff:
Nichole Hankins and Charles Dudding
Defendant:
Gold Crown Management L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Webster v. The United States of America
as 4:2019cv00613
Defendant:
The United States of America
Plaintiff:
Nichole Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Aguirre et al v. Correct Care Solutions, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2019cv00446
Plaintiff:
Dominic Michael Bonavia, Joe Carl Anthony Bonavia, Mika Rae Thurman and others
Defendant:
Shoniree Yvonne DeBusk, Miranda Van Stratten, Jackson County, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curtis v. Nichols et al
as 4:2019cv01216
Plaintiff:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant:
Ted House and Melanie Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farhner et al v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00342
Plaintiff:
Richard Dale Farhner, Nichole Webster and Renee Farhner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cook v. Norman et al
as 6:2019cv03140
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Koon, Justin Brock and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholes D Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.R. Sherry, Inc. et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00150
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
D.R. Sherry, Inc., Nichole Sherry and Daniel Sherry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Pettis County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv04044
Defendant:
S Nichols, Roy Hall, Pettis County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00273
Plaintiff:
Rechelle Nichols
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Gina Whitlock, Unknown Pewhitt, Nichole Green and others
Plaintiff:
Vennis P. Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
