Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Manuszak v. Esty et al
as 1:2010cv11046
Plaintiff:
Richard Manuszak
Defendant:
Benjamin C. Esty, Thomas E. Faust, Jr., Allen R. Freedman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Ewing v. Norton et al
as 3:2010cv30125
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Ewing
Defendant:
Anita A. Norton, Helen L. Nolan and Lenora Campoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
as 1:2009cv12202
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and U.S. Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
William Norton
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations
United States of America v. City of Attleboro, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2008cv12038
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of Attleboro, Massachusetts, Avnet, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Silva et al v. Middlesex County et al
as 1:2008cv11863
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Silva and Sean Cashman
Defendant:
Middlesex County, James DiPaula, Paul Norton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Norton v Jeff Bohn et al
as 1:2008cv11557
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norton
Defendant:
Jeff Bohn, John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv40157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2008cv11386
Plaintiff:
Alice E. Norton
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Elliott Company, Elliott Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norton v. USA
as 1:2008cv10520
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy P. Norton
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Garfield v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv11805
Plaintiff:
Wayne P. Garfield
Defendant:
John Doe, Middlesex County, James V. DiPaola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
