Cases 41 - 50 of 249
Miller v. Barnett et al
as 3:2022cv05620
Plaintiff:
David Montae Miller
Defendant:
Barnett, Pierce County Sheriff's Department, NaphCare Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Pierce County, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriquez v. Duran et al
as 2:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rodriguez Rodriquez
Defendant:
Dr. Duran, NaphCare Inc., Armida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Chronister
as 8:2022cv01496
Plaintiff:
Jessica Long
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, Naphcare, Inc. and Keith Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Chatman v. Washoe County Detention Center
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Marcel Chatman
Defendant:
Washoe County Detention Center, Washoe County, WCDF Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Ashley Glynn Branch
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGilbra v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Zafferine Amit McGilbra
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Pierce County Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv05382
Plaintiff:
Jaythaniel Young
Defendant:
Pierce County Corrections and NaphCare Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rae Hancock
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell Kemp, Sr. v. LVMPD, et al
as 22-15624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRELL DESHON KEMP, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, HUGH HARDY, #6000, LARRY WILLIAMSON, M.D. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
