Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Johnson et al v. Town of Duxbury et al
as 1:2016cv12578
Defendant:
Town of Duxbury and Matthew Clancy
Plaintiff:
Brian Johnson , Kelley O'Neil , Christopher Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Donnell v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv40158
Plaintiff:
Neil O'Donnell
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 1:2016cv11666
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Bennett, Department of Correction, Executive Office of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STORM v. TRIFIRO et al
as 4:2016cv40094
Defendant:
JAMES TRIFIRO , NEIL ERICKSON , Dylan Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
ERIK STORM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Benharris v. Zep, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11318
Defendant:
Zep, Inc. and Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neil Benharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
O'Connell Oil Associates, Inc. v. Whiting Farm Convenience Stores, Inc, et al
as 3:2016cv30083
Defendant:
Neil E Tierney and Whiting Farms Convenience Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
O'Connell Oil Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 1:2016mc91016
Petitioner:
Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
Thirdparty_defendant:
Ray Ozzie
Alston v. Town of Brookline et al
as 1:2015cv13987
Plaintiff:
Gerald Alston
Defendant:
Town of Brookline, Board of Selectmen of the Town of Brookline, Betsy DeWitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Celona et al v. Erickson et al
as 4:2015cv40147
Plaintiff:
Christopher Celona , Prudence Celona and Paul Celona
Defendant:
Neil Erickson , James F. Trifiro and Russ St. Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haroldson et al v. DraftKings Inc.
as 1:2015cv13581
Plaintiff:
Neil Haroldson and Aaron Schiro
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
