Cases 41 - 48 of 48
DeJesus v. Rikers Island Prison et al
as 7:2014cv07178
Plaintiff:
Ruben DeJesus
Defendant:
Rikers Island Prison and The State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Word v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2014cv00699
Petitioner:
Diane Word
Respondent:
State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Sheryl L. Zenzen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Byran Francis
Defendant:
The State of New York , New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision , DOCCS Employees John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safran v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2013cv01413
Petitioner:
David J. Safran
Respondent:
State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coston v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2013cv01170
Plaintiff:
Guy Coston
Defendant:
State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Medical Department and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coston v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2013cv06543
Plaintiff:
Guy Coston
Defendant:
State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and NYSDOCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keitt v. Hawks et al
as 1:2012cv02350
Plaintiff:
Devin Keitt
Defendant:
T. Hawks, M. Lira, D. Uhler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Fischer et al
as 9:2011cv00774
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Kenneth S. Perlman, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
