Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 489
Clark v. Michigan, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10759
Plaintiff: James Lee Clark, III and Tebtu Shekem
Defendant: Michigan, State of, 50th District Court, Michael C Martinez and others
Laurie Reynolds v. US
as 23-1287
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAURIE REYNOLDS
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Latasha Woolridge v. US
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant: LATASHA WOOLRIDGE
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Gerri Hood v. US
as 23-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant: GERRI F. HOOD
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Tonya Bowles, et al v. Eric Sabree, et al
as 23-1256
Plaintiff / Appellee: TONYA BOWLES, for herself and all those similarly situated and BRUCE TAYLOR, for himself and all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: ERIC R. SABREE, in his official and personal capacity and WAYNE COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, also sometimes known as Charter County of Wayne by its Board of Commissioners
Defendant: OAKLAND COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and ANDREW E. MEISNER, in his official and personal capacities
Barbara Mast v. US
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARBARA MAST
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Teresa Goin v. US
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERESA GOIN
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Christina Anderson v. US
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTINA ANDERSON
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Alan Meddows v. US
as 23-1272
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALAN MEDDOWS
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Beatrice Rivera Adams v. US
as 23-1271
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE, OCERINE COOPER and others
Not Yet Classified: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS and BEATRICE RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?