Cases 41 - 50 of 409
Carroll v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Ynohtna Carroll
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
Randy Bradley
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith, III
Defendant:
McFadden, Daniels, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 4:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
John Parker, Michael Parker and Virginia Parker
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
DeWeese v. White et al
as 4:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Bradley R DeWeese
Defendant:
White, Conners, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAllister v. White et al
as 4:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
John McAllister
Defendant:
White, Conners, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Parker
as 4:2022cv04063
Plaintiff:
Raul Moreno
Defendant:
James Joseph Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fernow v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Fernow
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, Wade Gilliam, Tonya Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Lane et al
as 3:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ryan Parker
Defendant:
Flossie Lane and Billy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Kumar et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
John Harris and Shawnta Parker
Defendant:
Satish Kumar and Ror Boys Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
