Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Bella v. Pollard et al
as 2:2015cv01247
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Bella
Defendant:
William Pollard , Donald Strahota, Tony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 2:2015cv00774
Plaintiff:
Roland Price
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans, LaDell v. Strahota et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
LaDell A. Evans
Defendant:
Strahota , Price , Wenzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oswald, Daniel v. Pollard, William et al
as 3:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Oswald
Defendant:
William Pollard , Anthony Meli, Brian Greff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
Joshua Howard, William E Weso, Adam Yeoman and others
Defendant:
Scott Walker, Edward Wall, James Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waas v. City of New Holstein et al
as 1:2014cv01266
Plaintiff:
Donald Alan Waas
Defendant:
City of New Holstein, Francis Schmitz, Gene P Woelfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Amelia Telephone Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00605
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services, Inc. and Verizon Select Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Amelia Telephone Corporation, Arvig Telephone Company, Badger Telecom, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Price v. Harley Davidson Motor Company Inc
as 2:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael R Price
Defendant:
Harley Davidson Motor Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Price v. Pugh
as 2:2012cv00770
Petitioner:
James Michael Price
Respondent:
Jeffrey Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brandt, Fredrick v. Fox, Douglas et al
as 3:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Fredrick J. Brandt
Defendant:
Douglas T. Fox, Price County and Taylor County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
