Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Crouchman v. Staff of Pickens County Detention Center
as 8:2016cv00688
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Crouchman
Defendant:
Staff of Pickens County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitchens et al v. Staff of Pickens County Detention Center
as 8:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Keith Kitchens
Defendant:
Pickens County Council, Rick Clark, Capt Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Clark et al
as 8:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Williamson
Defendant:
Rick Clark , Captain Nix and Unknown Defendants of Pickens County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Picken County Municipality et al
as 2:2015cv03605
Plaintiff:
Terry Edward McCall
Defendant:
Picken County Municipality, Pickens County Detention Cntr, Rick Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Pickens County Jail
as 6:2015cv02058
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joseph Clifton Thompson
Defendant:
Pickens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Morris v. Holland et al
as 5:2012cv02264
Plaintiff:
Larold Lee Morris
Defendant:
Becky Holland, Chad Hooper, Officer Lockaby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crouchman v. Pickens County LEC Jail et al
as 9:2012cv02231
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey William Crouchman
Defendant:
Pickens County LEC Jail, Keith Galloway, Drew Sisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodrow v. South Carolina et al
as 6:2010mc00156
Plaintiff:
James Woodrow
Defendant:
State Of South Carolina, Pickens County, Blue Ridge Electric Co Op Inc and others
Tennant v. SC Dept of Probation et al
as 3:2010cv02979
Petitioner:
Kirk James Tennant
Respondent:
SC Dept of Probation, Pickens County Detention Center and David Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
