Cases 41 - 50 of 61
HERNANDEZ v. FLORIDA STATE PRISON
as 3:2011cv01027
Plaintiff:
Peter Hernandez
Defendant:
Florida State Prison, R. Polk, Beighley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Rivera v. L.E. Griffis, et al
as 11-14514
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
L.E. GRIFFIS, Chief Corr. Officer (FSP/MU), FLORIDA SP WARDEN, Warden (FSP/MU), R. POLK, Asst. Warden (FSP/MU) and others
Mathis v. Slominski et al
as 3:2011cv00961
Plaintiff:
Thurman L. Mathis
Defendant:
J. Slominski, R. Polk, S. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. FLORIDA STATE PRISON
as 4:2011cv00436
Plaintiff:
PETER HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE PRISON, R POLK, BEIGHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Shemer et al
as 3:2011cv00505
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
M. Shemer, R. Bryant, L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manfred Polk v. BAC, et al
as 11-10741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANFRED POLK, Administrator of the Estate of Alesia R. Polk-White
Defendant - Appellee:
BAC, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP and others
Boatman v. Madan et al
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Elio Madan, P Gudino, Victor Selyutin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Le et al
as 2:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Bryan Le, S. E. Young, S. Cerdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatman v. Lee et al
as 3:2009cv00916
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Byran Lee, K. G.B. King, D. Cauwenbergh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Elbi of America Inc et al
as 4:2009cv02141
Plaintiff:
John J Clark, John J Clark, John J Clark and others
Defendant:
Elbi of America Inc and Elbi SPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
