Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson-Bey v. Carlton et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Jhakeel Jacksonbey and Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
E.K. Carlton, J. Burkett, FNU Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilahun v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Shua Tilahun
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Sgt. Bernhardt, Cory Furey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Polk et al
as 3:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
James L. Kelly
Defendant:
R. Polk, J. Carter, T. North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maurice R. Polk v. Marcus Pollard
as 2:2022cv03109
Petitioner:
Maurice R. Polk
Respondent:
Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maurice R. Polk v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2021cv05938
Petitioner:
Maurice R Polk
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TOBLER v. SKIGEN et al
as 5:2021cv00072
Defendant:
G BROCK, R POLK, ANDREW SKIGEN and others
Plaintiff:
MYRON TOBLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Colombani, et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Dr. Leslie Colombani, R. Polk, A Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. COLOMBAVI ETAL
as 4:2020cv00594
Defendant:
LESLIE COLOMBAVI, A LEE, R POLK and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
