Cases 41 - 50 of 385
Knope v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2023cv01206
Plaintiff:
Randall Joseph Knope
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones-El v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Jones-El
Defendant:
Mary Moore, Cheryl Jeanpierre, Randall Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuffie v. Doe
as 2:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Brandon C McDuffie
Defendant:
John Doe and Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis-Rogers v. Wussow et al
as 2:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Akiel Davis-Rogers
Defendant:
Joel Wussow, Randall Hepp and Yana Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derksen v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Roy Charles Derksen
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Fond du Lac County, Tony Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Smith
Defendant:
Randall Hepp and Waupun Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chipman v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robert Chipman
Defendant:
Randall Hepp, Emily Propson, Joe Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galmore et al v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Trevon Galmore, Terrance Lavell Kirksey and Julius Garrison
Defendant:
Randall R Hepp and Sgt Zeptka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snelson, Jeremy v. Wilson, Derek et al
as 3:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Snelson
Defendant:
Derek S. Wilson, Randal F. Wojciehoski, Daniel Lavoie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv00594
Petitioner:
Michael D Martin
Respondent:
Wardem Randall Hepp and Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
