Cases 41 - 50 of 119
CVS PHARMACY, INC. et al v. ABBVIE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03495
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, BESINS HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP., CVS PHARMACY, INC. and RITE AID CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
FARRA et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03452
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC., RITE AID CORPORATION, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY FARRA and DONNA FARRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIPER et al v. RITE AID CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01373
Plaintiff:
LINDA PIPER and VICTOR PIPER
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUPPETT v. RITE AID CORPORATION
as 3:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
CARY J. CUPPETT
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
KLEINER et al v. RITE AID CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv03975
Plaintiff:
ELLEN KLEINER and YURY KLEINER
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION , RITE AID OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HARRELL v. RITE AID CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv02960
Plaintiff:
DIONNA HARRELL
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
HARRELL v. RITE AID CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv02705
Plaintiff:
DIONNA HARRELL
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
