Cases 41 - 50 of 233
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv01602
Plaintiff:
Crystal Miller
Defendant:
Thomas Rodgers, Homegoods, Inc. and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Rodgers v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
David Lee Rodgers
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Odom v. Fuller et al
as 6:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
James Odom
Defendant:
Devon Fuller and B Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Bowers
as 4:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Warden Rodger Bowers and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Bowers
as 7:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Warden Rodger Bowers and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Ferguson et al
as 4:2021cv04246
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. Rogers, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Michael Ferguson, Judge Tom Lowe, Rattikin Title Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza et al v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas et al
as 2:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lina Monique Garza and Richard Mojica
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Phillip Peterson, Antonio Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De Pute v. Zook et al
as 3:2021cv01789
Plaintiff:
Rodger De Pute
Defendant:
K Zook, K F Bandas, A Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. NEC Networks, LLC
as 5:2021cv00692
Plaintiff:
Michelle Rodgers
Defendant:
NEC Networks, LLC d/b/a CaptureRX and NEC Networks, LLC d/b/a CaptureRX doing business as Capturerx
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Valverde v. Maxum Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 7:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Rodgers Paul Truitt and Maxum Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Maria De Jesus Valverde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
