Cases 41 - 50 of 1,684
Walls v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv04826
Plaintiff:
Roger Walls
Defendant:
Harris County and Officer J. Carrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEPS SERVICES, LLC v. BLUE ESCAPE POOLS LLC, ET AL.
as 4:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
BEPS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BLUE ESCAPES POOL & SPA
Defendant:
BLUE ESCAPE POOLS LLC and ROGER DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hafner v. DeLaura et al
as 6:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Hafner
Defendant:
Unknown DeLaura, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Murdock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Rogers
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Cathy Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Sharli Powell Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Discovery Card Corporate Office et al
as 4:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Lane Henderson
Defendant:
Discovery Card Corporate Office, Roger C. Hochschild, John T. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
White v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jacob White
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The City of Grapevine, Bruno Rumbelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
North v. Bank et al
as 4:2023cv03313
Plaintiff:
Julius Lamunn North
Defendant:
Discover Bank and Roger Hochschild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dodd v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Roger Lavoy Dodd
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
