Cases 41 - 50 of 806
Dearing v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Michael Dearing, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimmy Rogers, Logan Collins, Shawn Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04355
Plaintiff:
Roger Reynolds and Melanie Reynolds
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harris, Jr. et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Roger Harris, Jr. and Brandy Harris
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. Klompstra et al
as 1:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
TOTAL QUALITY LOGISTICS, LLC
Defendant:
Andrew Klompstra, Demetrius Rogers, Chemo, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Ward v. The State of Ohio et al
as 2:2022cv04119
Plaintiff:
Roger Ward
Defendant:
The State of Ohio, Randy Dupree, Jason Holdren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv02085
Plaintiff:
Kejuan L Rogers and Kejuan L. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Berryman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03715
Plaintiff:
Roger Berryman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Laura D. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ahron Williams
Defendant:
Warden Ron Erdos, C/O Kenyon, U.M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
