Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Karpachev v. Galligan
as 1:2008cv11514
Petitioner: Roman Karpachev
Respondent: Kevin T Galligan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Boston v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2008cv11107
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff: The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Boston
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ray Dean Wilson v. USA, et al
as 1:2008cv10792
Plaintiff: Ray Dean Wilson
Defendant: United States, U.S. Spreme Court, Nick Cage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roman v. Harris & Bruno Machine Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10762
Plaintiff: Zenaida Roman
Defendant: Harris & Bruno Machine Co., Inc., Longview Fibre Company, Ampac Packaging, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv30043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights Both
Roman v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2007cv10318
Petitioner: Jose Roman
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ulyanitsky v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv30004
Plaintiff: Roman Ulyanitsky
Defendant: Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Denis Riordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Federal Trade Commission v. Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv11136
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc. , ITV Direct, Inc. , Donald W. Barrett and others
Cross_defendant: ITV Direct, Inc.
Cross_claimant: Donald W. Barrett, Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc. and ITV Direct, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff: Nana Patricia McPeak
Garnishee: Bank of America NA, Richard Maihos, Roman Balanko and others
Intervenor_defendant: Federal Trade Commission
Trustee: Citizens Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?