Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01551
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WHITSON et al v. ROTH et al
as 5:2015cv01322
Plaintiff: DAVID WHITSON and MARY JO WHITSON
Defendant: SAMARA B. ROTH and ANDREW ROTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv01192
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROTH v. AKER PHILADELPHIA SHIPYARD COMPANY ASA
as 2:2014cv05663
Plaintiff: AUGUST ROTH
Defendant: AKER PHILADELPHIA SHIPYARD COMPANY ASA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROTH v. AMERICAN SHIPPING, ASA
as 2:2014cv05662
Plaintiff: AUGUST ROTH
Defendant: AMERICAN SHIPPING, ASA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03749
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BOWENS v. EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02689
Plaintiff: MONTEZ M. BOWENS
Defendant: EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETEL, KLOPOTOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADISON v. ROTH et al
as 2:2014cv01544
Plaintiff: MICHELLE MADISON
Defendant: MIKE ROTH and LEASE AND RENTAL MANAGEMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701
CANDELET v. ROTH et al
as 2:2014cv01442
Plaintiff: AIMEE CANDELET
Defendant: MIKE ROTH, SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Mobley v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00035
Plaintiff: Gerry Mobley, Jr.
Defendant: John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Traci Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?