Cases 41 - 50 of 1,448
Cooksey v. Seguir et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
James Roy Cooksey
Defendant:
Aida Vallestero Yana Seguir, Andrew Seguir, Frederich Bernard Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooksey v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
James Roy Cooksey
Defendant:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winningham v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
Roy Ronald Winningham
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roy et al v. The Fay Law Group, P.A. et al
as 4:2023cv03139
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roy and Christopher Gabel
Defendant:
The Fay Law Group, P.A., Caragh Fay and Thomas Fortune Fay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ussery v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02923
Petitioner:
Roy Eugene Ussery
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Mitchell v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv02872
Plaintiff:
Wendell Roy Mitchell
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Penny Kemp, Greg Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Abbott et al
as 1:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
United States of America.
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and The State of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey Arrington, Dr. Brian Babin, Cong. Andy Biggs and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 403 Obstruction of Navigable Waters
Jackson v. Zuniga
as 2:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Isabell Zuniga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cooksey v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
James Roy Cooksey
Respondent:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
