Cases 41 - 50 of 5,588
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Anders et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
N.W. Anders, C. Pittsinger, Ms. Sheffield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
HOLMES v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
WINDEL HOLMES
Defendant:
WELLPATH, RNS BRAD AVENALI, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sensenig v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Scott Sensenig
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Ealy v. Schell et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Vernon L. Ealy
Defendant:
Christopher Schell, Warden of DCP, Unknown Intake Nurse and Nursing Staff at DCP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
