Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Harris v. Hardeman County Sheriff Dept et al
as 1:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Martha J Harris
Defendant:
Hardeman County Sheriff Dept, County Jail and Deputies, Doolen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. State of Tennessee
as 4:2012cv00062
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Spark Networks, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02832
Plaintiff:
B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Spark Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sparks v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv00074
Plaintiff:
William R. Sparks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Sparks v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Louis W Sparks
Defendant:
United States of America, Veterans Affairs, Department of, Alvin York Veterans Affairs Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sparks v. White County, Tennessee, Board of Education
as 2:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Randy Sparks
Defendant:
White County, Tennessee, Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas v. Blount County Sheriff's Office Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kevin Thomas
Defendant:
Blount County Sheriff's Office Adult Detention Center, Nathan Sparks, Jeremy Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2011cv00168
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sparks v. State of Tennessee et al
as 4:2011cv00010
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Lee Posey Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
