Cases 41 - 50 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv11288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. CellnTell Distribution Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv24325
Defendant:
Simtec Trading LLC, SGM Socher, Inc., Simcha Charlop and others
Plaintiff:
TracFone Wireless, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00330
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Muhammad Sajid v. Mohammad Ijaz, et al
as 19-3043
Defendant / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD IJAZ
Defendant:
SHAISTA IJAZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MUHAMMAD SAJID
Hatton Group Limited Inc. et al v. Royal Asset Management RAM et al
as 2:2019cv02782
Plaintiff:
HATTON GROUP LIMITED INC, MH LIBYA, MH Libya Group for Investment and Joint Services and others
Defendant:
ROYAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, Sheik Saqer Nehayan, Sheikh Saqer Nahyan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01988
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Rodriguez Sosa v. Grand Prix Trading Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01090
Defendant:
Walter Doe, Sajid Nadeem, Zeljko Mazic and others
Plaintiff:
Adonis Rodriguez Sosa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00784
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Chiu et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11893
Plaintiff:
Sajid Wraich, Estate of Kum S. Lee, Craig Watkins and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Dish Network LLC. v. Jadoo TV, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09768
Plaintiff:
Dish Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Jadoo TV, Inc., Haseeb Shah, Sajid Sohail and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
